Home>Feature>Lombardo Says No More Waiting—Results on Election Night?

Lombardo Says No More Waiting—Results on Election Night?

By TheNevadaGlobeStaff, February 27, 2025 8:00 am

Let’s hone in on Governor Joe Lombardo’s proposal to require mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day—rather than four days after—during the 83rd Nevada Legislative Session. As of February 26, 2025, this reform lacks a bill number, but it’s a key focus for conservatives over the next 14 days. Here’s how it benefits all Nevada voters as a common-sense election fix, what it delivers on core conservative priorities, and where it falls short of broader election integrity goals—all while avoiding voter ID, ballot counting specifics, or voting machine debates.

Benefits for All Voters: Speed and Clarity

Lombardo’s push to nix the four-day post-Election Day grace period for mail-in ballots offers a straightforward win for every Nevadan: faster election results. Under the current rules, set by 2021’s AB 321, counties like Clark—home to most of the state’s voters—can take days to wrap up counts as late mail-ins roll in. In 2024, Nevada’s drawn-out process left everyone waiting, with final calls delayed in tight races. Requiring ballots to hit by 8 p.m. on Election Day would tighten the timeline, letting officials broadcast near-final tallies within hours, not days.

For voters, this cuts the uncertainty—no more waking up to shifting numbers or wondering how the count flipped. Rural folks in Elko or Churchill County get their say locked in alongside Las Vegas voters, without the sense that urban latecomers tip the scale. It’s practical: the U.S. Postal Service’s shaky reliability won’t drag things out, and everyone—shift workers, retirees, military families—gets a clear deadline. Transparency gets a boost too; drawn-out results breed doubt, and prompt reporting could settle nerves for all.

Main Common-Sense Election Reform Points Addressed

Lombardo’s proposal aligns with conservative calls for a more straightforward, reliable voting system. Here’s how it delivers:

  • Election Night Finality: Conservatives have long argued that results should wrap up when polls close—not days later. This change ensures Nevada knows its winners faster, cutting the chaos of extended counting windows.
  • Boosting Trust: After 2024’s slow-motion count, X lit up with frustration—think Chuck Muth dubbing it “a mess.” A firm deadline tells voters the system values clarity over prolonged uncertainty, especially in Clark County’s heavy mail-in zones.
  • Streamlined Process: Quick, decisive outcomes reflect a no-nonsense approach to elections. Nevada could mirror states like Florida, where 2024’s swift counts set a standard for efficiency.

Main Common-Sense Election Reform Points Missed

While this tweak hits a conservative sweet spot, it skips over other big-ticket priorities for election overhaul fans. Here’s what’s left out:

  • Voter ID: Many conservatives, from grassroots activists to big names like Adam Laxalt, want photo ID required for every vote—mail-in or in-person. Lombardo’s plan doesn’t touch this, leaving signature verification as the main check, which some see as too weak.
  • Voting Machine Reform: Plenty of Nevada conservatives push for hand-counted paper ballots, skeptical of machines used statewide. This proposal keeps the tech status quo, focusing only on timing—not how votes are tallied.
  • Curbing Mail-In Voting: Some in the GOP base want universal mail ballots scaled back or axed, alongside tougher voter roll cleanup. Lombardo’s reform trims the edges but doesn’t rethink the mail-in system itself, like undoing AB 321.

Why It Matters—and What’s Next

For all voters, this reform’s promise of prompt results could calm tensions and shore up faith in Nevada’s elections, especially in a state where tight races magnify every hiccup. For conservatives, it’s a common-sense step toward a cleaner, faster process, though it’s not the full overhaul some crave. Over the next two weeks, expect GOP lawmakers—maybe Sen. Pete Goicoechea or Assemblywoman Heidi Kasama—to pitch this in committee, while voices on X urge Lombardo to aim higher. Democrats will likely label it “voter suppression,” but that argument falls flat. We manage to meet deadlines for bills, licenses, and more—surely we can mail a ballot by a set date. It’s a simple task, and it costs us nothing!

Stay tuned!

Speak Up, Nevada! What’s on Your Mind? Send us your opinion!

Got the inside scoop on something happening in Nevada? Or the country? Do you have thoughts about life in Nevada that are too good to keep to yourself? Whether it’s a hot take on our politics, crime, education, or even the secret to surviving our summers, we’re all ears! Swing them our way at editor@thenevadaglobe.com. Come on, give us the scoop on what makes Nevada tick—or what ticks you off. Let’s make some noise and have some fun with it!

Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *