Last time, we unpacked Edward Solomon’s eerie findings on those identical vote ratios in Washoe and Clark, patterns that scream manipulation. But Solomon’s like an onion, peel back one layer, and there’s more rot underneath. Let’s walk through some real Nevada stories that highlight his other exposés, because understanding this is key to demanding change. Remember, Solomon has never been disproven, and his $80,000 challenge to prove him wrong stands undefeated.

Take phantom voters. Solomon’s dives into 2020 Clark County data revealed batches where vote totals exceeded registered voters in certain precincts. For example, in one audit he referenced during 2022 testimony, discrepancies showed up to 5% overcounts in mail-in batches, per public records from the Secretary of State’s office. He ties this to “batch flipping,” where software allegedly swaps votes mid-tabulation to maintain those precise ratios he flagged earlier.

Another gem: Solomon spotlighted how Nevada’s universal mail-in system, expanded in 2020, created loopholes for harvesting. In Washoe, he found anomalies where late-night ballot dumps had near-identical margins, think 70% for one candidate in dumps after midnight, defying daytime trends. This echoed in the 2022 Gilbert case, where court filings noted Solomon’s evidence of “pre-programmed outcomes.” While judges dismissed the suit for lack of standing, the data persists in election archives.

Now, Solomon’s latest work dives into “see-saw” patterns, a mathematical framework he calls STUV, S for Trump No, T for Kamala No, U for Trump Yes, V for Kamala Yes on a proposition like abortion rights. Imagine four boxes of ballots. In a fair election, votes fill them randomly based on people’s choices. But Solomon shows in Clark’s 2024 mail-in data, these boxes balance like a see-saw, where one side’s weight forces the other to tip predictably.

Simple example: Think of two kids on a playground see-saw. If one weighs more, the other flies up. Solomon’s “hyperbolic reflection law” is like that, X = Z + P(Z – Y), where X reflects Y over Z, scaled by P. In votes, if total opposition (Omega) is fixed flat, and Democrat opposition (N) stays constant, Republican opposition (M) must curve down as Trump share (Alpha) rises. In Clark, Omega was flat while N was locked at 5%, forcing M to oscillate wildly. To the average person, it’s like baking a cake with fixed sugar (Omega) and flour (N), the eggs (M) must adjust exactly, or the recipe fails. But votes aren’t recipes, they should vary freely.

This means manipulation: Software enforces these reflections, creating fake partisan splits. In Nevada’s abortion question, Republicans appeared more opposed than Democrats, but Solomon’s see-saws show it’s an algebraic illusion, not real views. Across districts, lines for Trump and Kamala opposition moved in lockstep parallel motion, like synchronized swimmers, impossible without control.

These insights aren’t just for wonks, they explain why conservatives feel disenfranchised. The problem? Machines enable hidden flips and phantoms, eroding faith. Hell, we can’t even see their code, let alone trust what it outputs. Did you know all of Solomon’s work is based solely on county-furnished data? Meaning it’s the cast vote records the county furnished him, he simply analyzes it and reports to you what he finds. Did you know the Cast Vote Records are supposed to be permanent? Meaning once they are cast, they can’t be changed? Well, did you know after the two years they keep the physical ballots, they were destroyed? Yet months later, with zero ballots in hand, the cast vote records changed! Yes, that’s right, they changed! So if they are unchangeable once cast, how can they be changed, and how can they be changed if there aren’t even ballots to count to update the records? Don’t worry, we’ll tell you where and when this happened coming up. In the meantime, what are solutions conservatives and the informed skeptical ask for? Solutions include banning machines, returning to paper ballots hand-counted at precincts, with voter ID and same-day results to ensure transparency.

So, what now? Leaders like Trump could use this to push reforms. In the next part, we’ll explore how Trump, Pam Bondi, and law enforcement might step in to crack down. It’s the action plan we’ve been waiting for, join me there, and see how federal penalties could solve 99% of these issues.

__________________________________________

Speak Up, Nevada! What’s on Your Mind? Send us your opinion!

Got the inside scoop on something happening in Nevada? Or the country? Do you have thoughts about life in Nevada that are too good to keep to yourself? Whether it’s a hot take on our politics, crime, education, or even the secret to surviving our summers, we’re all ears! Swing them our way at editor@thenevadaglobe.com. Come on, give us the scoop on what makes Nevada tick—or what ticks you off. Let’s make some noise and have some fun with it!