Police Union Considers Strike Tactics Against PERS Hike—Nevada Law On the Line

Las Vegas police could be gearing up for a showdown over forced pay cuts—again. The Police Protective Association recently wrapped a member poll on whether to strike or use “sick leave” in protest of an upcoming increase in retirement contributions (PERS), driven by the state. While public-sector striking is illegal in Nevada, the very suggestion highlights a growing tension: law-enforcement union leaders are pushing back hard against shrinking take-home pay, even as they serve and protect our communities.

Union president Steve Grammas confirmed the survey closed Friday, and he hinted negotiations with Metro are expanding. But the city and county are tight-lipped. With the current collective bargaining agreement in place through June 2026, local officials say they’re “closely monitoring” the situation. A city spokesperson pointed out the law bars public safety strikes and warned of steep fines or even jail time for any union-led work stoppage.

Still, the union’s four poll options included everything from an Independence Day strike to using sick leave or “blue flu,” to simply accepting the pay cut. The underlying issue? Retirement contributions—Nevada PERS rates are jumping from 50% to nearly 59%, all shared equally between employer and employee. Even with a modest 2.6% cost-of-living bump, officers could see around a 2% drop in their net pay.

Critics argue the union is stirring unrest over what boils down to a mandated adjustment. Defenders point out that good men and women in uniform deserve fair compensation, especially when schedules and risks remain unchanged. Some cite a recent teacher “sick-out” case, suggesting law enforcement might follow similar tactics. Others note that public opinion—often split on police—is critical at moments like this.

At its heart, this debate is a test of priorities. Will the union choose disruption, risking public safety and legal blowback, or will they step up and honor their duty? And as lawmakers—and voters—watch, one question looms larger: do our first responders receive the respect, compensation, and support they earn?

Source: Las Vegas Review‑Journal