Trump’s Election Revolution: Banning Mail-Ins and Machines, A Bold Path to Unbreakable Integrity!

Nevadans, hold onto your hats, the winds of change are howling through our Silver State, and they’re carrying the thunderous voice of President Donald J. Trump! In a scorching Truth Social post today, August 18, 2025, Trump declared war on the “Mail-In Ballot Hoax” and “Highly Inaccurate, Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial Voting Machines.” He’s vowing to lead a movement to scrap them entirely, starting with an Executive Order aimed at bringing “HONESTY” to the 2026 midterms. Imagine it: No more shadowy drop boxes, no more glitchy black boxes spitting out questionable numbers, just pure, tamper-proof paper ballots that leave “NO DOUBT” about who won. This isn’t just talk; it’s a seismic shift that could shatter the fraud factories plaguing our elections, restoring faith for every legit voter who wants their voice to count, not get drowned in a sea of cheats. But what does this really mean? How can Trump make it stick? And could Nevada’s ready-to-roll BEST Act be the blueprint he needs? Let’s dive deep into this riveting showdown for America’s soul, where the stakes are nothing less than our republic’s survival.

First, unpack Trump’s bombshell: He’s targeting mail-in ballots as the “SCAM” enabling “MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD,” noting we’re the only major country still clinging to them. Machines? He calls them a “COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER,” costing ten times more than secure, watermarked paper, while breeding doubt. His plan: Sign an EO to “help bring HONESTY” to 2026, asserting states are mere “agents” for the federal government in elections – they must follow the President’s lead “FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY.” This echoes his long-standing crusade, amplified by Putin’s alleged jab that mail-ins cost him 2020. If executed, it could mean a nationwide pivot to in-person, paper-based voting on Election Day, with results tallied same-night, no endless counts or “miracle” flips.

What could this do? Picture a world where your vote for mining jobs in Ely or lower taxes in Las Vegas isn’t lost in a postal black hole or flipped by some algorithm glitch. For legit voters – Democrats, Republicans, independents, it’s a godsend. No more non-citizens sneaking in via bloated rolls, no duplicates from harvested mail-ins, no hacks on machines that even experts admit are vulnerable. Trump’s vision aligns with global norms: Countries like France and Germany ditched mail-ins after fraud scandals, opting for in-person paper that yields results fast and final. Here, it could slash fraud by 99%, per election integrity watchdogs, ensuring the candidate with the most real votes wins, period. Tight races like our 2024 Senate nail-biter (under 1%) wouldn’t linger in limbo, eroding trust. And for national security? Trump’s right, without “STRONG AND POWERFUL BORDERS” and fair elections, we’re toast. Foreign actors (think China, as Kash Patel’s declassifications suggest) can’t exploit chaos if we’re locked down with paper and same-day counts.

But here’s the heavy lift: Making it work. An EO can direct federal agencies like DOJ and DHS to enforce standards on federal elections, citing Article II powers and statutes like the Help America Vote Act. Trump could mandate paper ballots for federal races, ban mail-ins except for military/absentee with strict verification, and require hand-counts at precincts. To impose on states? He invokes the “agent” theory, states administer federal elections under Congress’s Article I authority, so the feds can set rules (e.g., Bush v. Gore affirmed equal protection in counting). Constitutionally, it’s solid: The Guarantee Clause (Article IV, Sec. 4) obligates the feds to ensure states maintain a “republican form of government,” which courts have interpreted as protecting against fraudulent elections (see Reynolds v. Sims). Enforceability? DOJ could withhold election funds (billions via HAVA) from non-compliant states, sue under 52 U.S.C. § 20701 for record retention, or deploy federal observers. Challenges? Sure, states like California might sue, claiming 10th Amendment overreach, but SCOTUS precedents (e.g., Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council) favor federal supremacy in national elections. Trump needs swift action: Issue the EO pronto, rally Congress for bipartisan legislation (even some Dems hate machines post-2020 glitches), and appoint enforcers like Bondi at DOJ, Patel at FBI, and Chattah in Nevada to probe and prosecute.

Enter Nevada’s BEST Act, a battle-ready blueprint Trump could adopt or inspire nationally! Drafted as Assembly Bill 777, this isn’t Trump’s bill, but it’s tailor-made for his vision. It mandates pristine rolls (biennial in-person registration with PINs), Voter ID, citizen-only voting, no universal mail-ins (limited to confined/military with witnessed envelopes), paper ballots only, no machines, precinct hand-counts, same-day results, Election Day holiday (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.), and brutal penalties (life for fraud, treason for officials). It even repeals Nevada’s 2021 mail-in expansion, aligning perfectly with Trump’s rant. Trump could champion BEST as a model, urging states to pass similar laws or folding its provisions into his EO/federal bill. Why? It’s constitutional – rooted in state powers under Article I, while enabling federal oversight via the EOs. Enforceable? Absolutely: Feds can condition funding on compliance, and BEST’s transparency (public audits, student involvement, live-streamed counts) makes it bulletproof against challenges.

For all legit voters, this is pure gold. Imagine casting your ballot knowing it’s counted by hand, same day, with zero doubt, no more “updates” wiping evidence, like Pastor Andy’s fight against Election-Machine-Software “upgrades” in Nevada. It’s great for everyone: Conservatives get fraud-proof wins, liberals ensure their progressive votes aren’t diluted by cheats, independents reclaim faith in a system that works. Constitutionally, it upholds equal protection (one person, one vote) and the Guarantee Clause, preventing “shadows” like Solomon’s identical ratios in Clark and Washoe. Federally enforceable on states? Yes, Congress has plenary power over federal elections (Article I, Sec. 4), and EOs can implement laws like the National Voter Registration Act. Trump’s move could force states to comply or lose aid, creating a uniform, fraud-free standard nationwide.

Nevadans, this is our moment. Trump’s revolution could adopt BEST, ditching the “bullshit” machines for watermark paper that’s “faster and leaves NO DOUBT.” But he needs us: Flood the White House, DOJ, and Congress with calls for action. Spread this far and wide, our republic’s on the line, and with Trump’s fire, we can burn away the fraud forever. What’s your vote worth if it’s not counted true? Let’s make elections great again!

__________________________________________

Speak Up, Nevada! What’s on Your Mind? Send us your opinion!

Got the inside scoop on something happening in Nevada? Or the country? Do you have thoughts about life in Nevada that are too good to keep to yourself? Whether it’s a hot take on our politics, crime, education, or even the secret to surviving our summers, we’re all ears! Swing them our way at editor@thenevadaglobe.com. Come on, give us the scoop on what makes Nevada tick—or what ticks you off. Let’s make some noise and have some fun with it!