Nevada Judge Upholds Parental Rights, Denies Planned Parenthood Injunction

Planned Parenthood just lost a major round in Nevada’s courts, and parents finally regained a measure of influence that should never have been stripped away. A Clark County judge denied Planned Parenthood Mar Monte’s request to block the state’s long-standing parental notification law, a statute first passed in 1985 but ignored for decades. With Roe v. Wade overturned, this commonsense safeguard is once again in effect, requiring doctors to notify parents before performing abortions on minors—unless a court bypass is granted.

Planned Parenthood insists the law is unconstitutional and harmful, claiming young people can and should make such life-altering decisions without parental involvement. But that argument is just another example of the left’s ongoing push to separate children from parental authority, replacing family values with government-approved ideology.

Judge Erika Mendoza wasn’t persuaded, noting that Planned Parenthood’s claims lacked legal footing and failed to show they’d succeed in court. The decision clears the way for enforcement of parental notification, reinforcing that parents have a right to know when their underage daughters are seeking an abortion.

The Archdiocese of Las Vegas welcomed the ruling, pointing out that parental rights are rooted not only in law but also in the moral responsibility entrusted to families. And they are right: parents, not political activists or special interest groups, should guide children through decisions with lifelong consequences.

This battle underscores a larger truth: the left often disguises its agenda as “health care access” while pushing policies that strip parents of their role. Nevada’s revived law doesn’t ban abortion; it simply ensures parents are not cut out of the process when minors are involved. That is not extremism—it is common sense.

Source: Las Vegas Review-Journal