Home>Articles>Clark County Election Integrity Hearing Looms: A System Still Shrouded in Doubt

Clark County Election Integrity Hearing Looms: A System Still Shrouded in Doubt

By TheNevadaGlobeStaff, March 13, 2025 8:00 am

CARSON CITY, NV – On Monday, March 17, Clark County election officials will face a state oversight panel to dissect the 2024 election’s aftermath—audits, staffing woes, and Governor Joe Lombardo’s push to axe Nevada’s four-day mail ballot grace period. For conservatives who’ve long sounded the alarm on election integrity, this hearing is a critical moment. But don’t hold your breath for real answers. Despite promises of reform, Nevada’s voting system remains a labyrinth of opacity, with reforms that critics say do little to restore trust—and plenty that erode it further.

The hearing, set against the backdrop of the 83rd legislative session, will see Clark County’s top brass testify on post-2024 audits and staffing shortages that plagued the nation’s slowest vote count last November. Governor Lombardo, a Republican stalwart, has zeroed in on the grace period—where ballots postmarked by Election Day can trickle in until November 9—calling it a trust-killer that drags out results. He’s not wrong. The 2024 election saw Nevada mocked as a “national embarrassment,” with Clark County’s mail ballot slog fueling conservative suspicions of foul play. Yet, Democrats, clutching their legislative supermajorities, are digging in, branding the proposal voter suppression. Same old song and dance.

Here’s the rub: audits and “logic and accuracy” tests—the supposed gold standard for election integrity—aren’t inspiring confidence. Robert Beadles, the firebrand behind Operation Sunlight, has spent years exposing what he calls a rigged game. His blog posts, backed by affidavits and observer reports, argue that Nevada’s pre- and post-election testing of voting machines is a sham. Beadles points to lax oversight, chain-of-custody breaches, and machines that pass muster despite glaring flaws. Then there’s Edward Solomon, the mathematician whose 2020 analyses of vote patterns—who’s never been debunked—suggest algorithms can slip past these tests undetected. If that’s true, how accurate are they really? A 2022 lawsuit by Pastor Andy in Washoe County echoed this, alleging systemic failures in machine testing that courts sidestepped rather than refuted.

Nevada law mandates “logic and accuracy” checks (NRS 293.391), where machines are fed test ballots to ensure they tally right. Sounds good on paper. But Beadles, Solomon, and others argue it’s theater—static tests that can’t catch dynamic manipulation. Solomon’s work, controversial as it is, posits that vote-switching code could dodge detection, leaving audits as mere window dressing. Pastor Andy’s legal push, though unsuccessful, spotlighted the same distrust: if machines pass but results don’t add up, what’s the point? The state’s response? Crickets—or worse, doubling down on a system conservatives see as compromised.

OPINION: Federal Mass Conspiracy to Forge Cast Vote Records

OPINION: Blindfolded Trust – The Unacceptable Status Quo of Nevada’s Elections

Post-2024, Clark County’s audit found no widespread fraud, per Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar’s January 2024 assurances. Staffing’s another mess—over half of Nevada’s top election officials have bailed since 2020, with Clark’s Joe Gloria retiring after 2022’s chaos. The hearing will probe whether current crews can handle the load, but don’t expect soul-searching. Instead, we’ll likely get platitudes about “secure elections” while Lombardo’s grace-period fix—a rare GOP win—faces a Democratic buzzsaw.

What’s maddening is the reform trajectory. After 2020’s mail ballot free-for-all, Nevada expanded early voting and kept the grace period, moves sold as “access” but reeking of opacity to conservatives. Signature verification’s a joke—thousands of ballots got “cured” in 2024, yet 9,000+ were tossed for mismatches. Meanwhile, 1,600 uncounted ballots surfaced post-election in Clark County, “stuck in duplication,” officials claimed. No results flipped, but the snafu—paired with zero transparency on why—lit up Nevada GOP calls for a reckoning. Lombardo and Aguilar talk bipartisan reform, but the 2023 Legislature’s “election worker safety” law (SB 406) is under fire from the ACLJ, and a dedicated SOS investigative team feels more like PR than progress.

Nevada Globe Exclusive: ACLJ Backs Robert Beadles in Federal Fight Against SB 406, Warns of Threats to Free Speech and Election Integrity

This hearing could’ve been a turning point. Instead, it’s shaping up as another missed shot. Conservatives want hand-counted paper ballots and same-day voting—clarity you can touch. What they’re getting is more machines, more delays, and a system where “trust us” is the punchline. Beadles warns of “election issues” swept under the rug; Solomon’s math hints at deeper rot. If algorithms can outsmart the safeguards, as they claim, then Monday’s testimony is just noise. Nevada’s elections aren’t reformed—they’re retooled to look secure while leaving the back door ajar. We’ll post the time and location as soon as we know it. Stay tuned….

Speak Up, Nevada! What’s on Your Mind? Send us your opinion!

Got the inside scoop on something happening in Nevada? Or the country? Do you have thoughts about life in Nevada that are too good to keep to yourself? Whether it’s a hot take on our politics, crime, education, or even the secret to surviving our summers, we’re all ears! Swing them our way at editor@thenevadaglobe.com. Come on, give us the scoop on what makes Nevada tick—or what ticks you off. Let’s make some noise and have some fun with it!

Spread the news:

 RELATED ARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *