After Primary ‘Glitch’, Think Tank Calls for Bipartisan Changes To Nevada Election Laws

Even more than most states, Nevada sharply revamped its electoral methods during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020 its legislature adopted full vote by mail with mailed ballots, required counties to establish ballot drop boxes, mandated a minimum number of in-person polling places, eased the cure process for rejected ballots and legalized the practice of ballot collection, all at first on an emergency basis that it subsequently made permanent.

The state also implemented two measures adopted shortly before then, automatic voter registration through motor vehicles offices and same-day registration. In large part because of these changes, many progressive election advocacy groups now rank Nevada highly among states exemplifying their preferences. (emphasis added).

Election reform should be – but in Carson City hasn’t always been – a bipartisan affair. As a so-called purple state, Nevada badly needs bipartisan buy-in on a combination of practices broadly responsive to the reasonable concerns of both parties. Voter convenience and ballot integrity, reliability and transparency, should not be seen as red or blue, Democratic or Republican causes. That also requires all sides to see that there are going to be inevitable trade-offs between good things, in elections as in the rest of life. The quest is not for perfection, which no system can deliver, but for best practices.

These sweeping reforms to Nevada’s election laws were made without a single Republican vote.

The lack of bipartisanship when changing how Nevadan’s exercise their fundamental right to vote certainly caused a heightened distrust in the electoral process, yet any changes introduced by Governor Lombardo and Republican legislators during the last legislative session were “dead on arrival” and never received a hearing.

Despite lacking ballot chain of custody and Voter ID, unlimited and unsecured ballot harvesting, delayed election results, and glitchy primaries, SOS Aguilar proudly maintains that Nevada’s elections are safe, secure and transparent. Democratic Attorney General Aaron Ford shockingly stated that Voter ID was “unconstitutional” despite dozens of states requiring identification to vote.

Although SOS Aguilar and his Democratic colleagues dismiss concerns and widespread distrust in elections with unconvincing claims of “safe and secure elections,” distrust in the electoral process is voter suppression.

It is safe to assume that any election integrity measures recommended by Nevada Policy or drafted by Republican legislators will continue to be “dead on arrival” with a Democratic majority, a majority that is one state Senate seat away from having a veto-proof supermajority.

As voters look toward Washington DC to choose their next president in 2024, Nevadans who are concerned with election integrity are encouraged to look in their own back yards and at down-ballot elections in order to usher in Assembly and Senate proponents who can restore their voice and their confidence in Silver State elections and restore a bipartisan balance in the state legislature.